Policy Issues and Challenges for Interagency Space System Acquisition
Download eBook for Free
|PDF file||6.1 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
Purchase Print Copy
|Add to Cart||Paperback152 pages||$20.00||$16.00 20% Web Discount|
Agencies within the national security space community recently have come under increasing pressure to conduct joint or interagency programs to take advantage of potentially shared objectives and mission synergies. Such joint endeavors, it is hoped, will make the agencies more efficient and effective and eliminate unnecessary redundancies among programs. However, a number of policy issues and challenges will influence how these efforts are executed. This report seeks to illuminate these policy issues and challenges, particularly those that will influence multi-mission space system concepts and programs conducted jointly by the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) and the Air Force. Using case studies, this report examined five ways to conduct acquisition in an interagency setting-Executing Agent, System Integrator, Independent Agent, Confederation, and Joint Program Office. The report analyzed key elements inherent to interagency acquisition, including acquisition complexity, program management, program control, requirements management, funding stability, customer responsiveness, cultural alignment, and staffing. The report contained the following findings: Interagency efforts such as those conducted by the NRO and the Air Force need to maintain high-level support, not only from agency leadership but also from key stakeholders, users, and the Congress, and consistency with national policy guidance and objectives. Certain coordinating documents, such as the memorandum of agreement/memorandum of understanding, implementation plan and strategy, and program funding strategy are critical to ensuring commonality of purpose in the early stages of an interagency effort. Requirements management is critical, particularly in adjudicating among differing agency and user requirements to deter requirements creep by the partner agencies. Ensuring funding stability is important, especially when coordinating between two (or more) very different budgetary processes and timetables. Organizational culture can influence both operational capabilities and organizational structure and process, and its effects on interagency programs should not be underestimated.
Table of Contents
Framework for Analysis
Possible Approaches to Implementing an Interagency Program Office (IPO) Concept
Conclusions and Insights
NPOESS Case Study
Aresenal Ship Case Study
Research conducted by
The research described in this report was performed under the auspices of RAND's National Security Research Division.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.