Interpretations of National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) Anchor Points and Achievement Levels by the Print Media in 1991

by Daniel Koretz, Edward Deibert


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback49 pages $23.00 $18.40 20% Web Discount

Presenting the results of educational assessments to lay audiences requires a difficult balance between accuracy and simplicity. This study investigates the effectiveness with which the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) has communicated information about the performance of American students to the print media. In the case of the 1990 assessment of mathematics, NAEP tried two methods of characterizing student performance. One method selected arbitrary points on the distribution of student scores, called "anchor points," and used items answered by most students at each point as a basis for descriptions of student performance. The second method set three points on the scale, called "achievement levels," to reflect judgments about what students should be able to do and provided verbal descriptions of the proficiency of students at each level. A review of a large number of newspaper and magazine articles found that the anchor-point and achievement-level descriptions were widely used by press writers but that their use of them was often unsatisfactory. The resulting reports appeared clear, but many were in fact simplistic or incorrect. For example, many writers who presented actual test items confused the percentage of students reaching each level with the typically much higher percentage answering illustrative items correctly. Writers rarely mentioned the judgmental basis of the achievement levels. The results suggest that better methods are needed to profile student performance for lay audiences.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.