Airborne Intercept

Boost- and Ascent-Phase Options and Issues

by David Vaughan, Jeffrey A. Isaacson, Joel Kvitky

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback43 pages $7.50 $6.00 20% Web Discount

A combination of boost-phase intercept (BPI) and ascent-phase intercept (API) of theater ballistic missiles has significant operational merits. Although current defense plans do not anticipate using manned aircraft with onboard sensors in this role, the uncertainties associated with other API/BPI concepts suggest that this approach may be revisited. The authors describe the factors bearing on airborne interceptor development and examine three nominal paths to achieving it. Operational considerations deserving some attention in considering these paths are also discussed, including several potential synergies between API/BPI and ground-attack operations.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.