Transfer Pricing for Air Force Depot-Level Reparables

Laura H. Baldwin, Glenn A. Gotz

ResearchPublished 1998

The Air Force implemented stock funding to manage most depot-level reparables (DLRs) in FY 1992. The working capital fund charges customers for their purchases of serviceable DLRs, pays them for the return of items needing repair or replacement, and purchases depot-level repair and replacements. Stock funding gives customer commands responsibility for obtaining budgets to purchase DLR repairs and replacements. The market-like system was intended to provide customers with incentives to make cost-effective repair decisions at the local level. This report discusses problems that may result from these incentives that affect the Air Force's ability to efficiently meet its support goals. The authors recommend that the structure of DLR prices be changed to improve the compatibility of customer incentives and overall Air Force support goals. The price system should be structured so that customers face the costs their decisions impose upon the support system. In other words, costs should be recovered through a series of charges to the customers responsible for generating those costs.

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1998
  • Pages: 117
  • Document Number: MR-808-AF

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Baldwin, Laura H. and Glenn A. Gotz, Transfer Pricing for Air Force Depot-Level Reparables. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1998. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR808.html.
BibTeX RIS

Research conducted by

This publication is part of the RAND monograph report series. The monograph report was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.