Class Action Dilemmas

Pursuing Public Goals for Private Gain, Executive Summary

Deborah R. Hensler, Bonnie Dombey-Moore, Elizabeth Giddens, Jennifer Gross, Erik Moller, Nicholas M. Pace

ResearchPublished 1999

Class action lawsuits — allowing one or a few plaintiffs to represent many who seek redress — have long been controversial. The current controversy, centered on lawsuits for money damages, is characterized by sharp disagreement among stakeholders about the kinds of suits being filed, whether plaintiffs' claims are meritorious, and whether resolutions to class actions are fair or socially desirable. Ultimately, these concerns lead many to wonder, "Are class actions worth their costs to society and to business? Do they do more harm than good?" To describe the landscape of current damage class action litigation, elucidate problems, and identify solutions, the RAND Institute for Civil Justice conducted a study using qualitative and quantitative research methods. The researchers concluded that the controversy over damage class actions has proven intractable because it implicates deeply held but sharply contested ideological views among stakeholders. Nevertheless, many of the political antagonists agree that class action practices merit improvement. The authors argue that both practices and outcomes could be substantially improved if more judges would supervise class action litigation more actively and scrutinize proposed settlements and fee awards more carefully. Educating and empowering judges to take more responsibility for case outcomes — and ensuring that they have the resources to do so — can help the civil justice system achieve a better balance between the public goals of class actions and the private interests that drive them.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
50 pages
List Price
$23.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1999
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 50
  • Paperback Price: $23.00
  • Paperback ISBN/EAN: 978-0-8330-2791-7
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/MR969.1
  • Document Number: MR-969/1-ICJ

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Hensler, Deborah R., Bonnie Dombey-Moore, Elizabeth Giddens, Jennifer Gross, Erik Moller, and Nicholas M. Pace, Class Action Dilemmas: Pursuing Public Goals for Private Gain, Executive Summary, RAND Corporation, MR-969/1-ICJ, 1999. As of October 13, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR969z1.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Hensler, Deborah R., Bonnie Dombey-Moore, Elizabeth Giddens, Jennifer Gross, Erik Moller, and Nicholas M. Pace, Class Action Dilemmas: Pursuing Public Goals for Private Gain, Executive Summary. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1999. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR969z1.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND monograph report series. The monograph report was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.