Comparing the Costs of DoD Military and Civil Service Personnel

by Susan M. Gates, Albert A. Robbert

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 4.7 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback120 pages $15.00 $12.00 20% Web Discount

In an era of heightened concern within DoD over operating costs, there is renewed interest in civilianization — the transfer of functions performed by military personnel to civil service personnel. This interest stems from a fundamental assumption that civil service workers are less expensive than their military counterparts. At the request of the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), RAND researchers examined the factors influencing the cost-effectiveness of civilianization — in particular, the relative cost of a military workyear and a civil service workyear, the way in which workforce substitution occurs, and the effects of substitution on the overall workforce. The authors demonstrated that underlying assumptions about the nature and impact of substitution of civil service for military workers significantly influence the benefits to be derived from civilianization. As a result, they find that civilianization can produce cost savings under many, but not all, circumstances. Moreover, the authors find that policies designed to maximize cost savings can have a negative impact on military readiness and career-progression opportunities in both the military and civil service workforces. For example, under current military personnel management and budgeting arrangements, a cost-effective civilianization policy would require DoD to limit substitution to positions that could be filled with lower-grade civil service workers. While such a policy might generate substantial cost savings, it could create personnel-management problems within both workforces. The authors recommend that the OSD modify its current guidance on military/civil service position assignments. Revised guidance should specify that assignment decisions be predicated on three considerations: military necessity, cost, and career-progression opportunities. Study findings should be of interest to OSD, service, and defense agency personnel managers and policymakers, especially those involved in the evaluation of civilianization policy. Managers of outsourcing and cost-comparison processes may also have an interest in the findings.

Table of Contents

  • Chapter One

    Introduction

  • Chapter Two

    Approaches for Substituting Civil Service Personnel for Military Personnel

  • Chapter Three

    Cost Analysis

  • Chapter Four

    Comparing the Costs of Civil Service and Military Personnel: Two Approaches

  • Chapter Five

    Conclusions

  • Appendix A

    Assumptions About Military Strength Changes and Related Costs

  • Appendix B

    Interservice Data Displays and Percentile Distributions

This report is part of the RAND Corporation monograph report series. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.