The chances are growing that the United States will find itself in a crisis in cyberspace — the escalation of tensions associated with a major cyberattack, suspicions that one has taken place, or fears that it might do so soon. Such crises can be managed by taking steps to reduce the incentives for other states to step in, controlling the narrative, understanding the stability parameters of the crises, and recognizing escalation risks.
Crisis and Escalation in Cyberspace
Published Jan 3, 2013
Download eBook for Free
|Best for desktop computers.
|Best for mobile devices.
On desktop computers and some mobile devices, you may need to download an eBook reader to view ePub files. Calibre is an example of a free and open source e-book library management application.
|Best for Kindle 1-3.
On desktop computers and some mobile devices, you may need to download an eBook reader to view mobi files. Amazon Kindle is the most popular reader for mobi files.
Purchase Print Copy
|Add to Cart
- How should the Air Force integrate kinetic and nonkinetic (cyber) operations?
- How should escalation options and risks be treated?
The chances are growing that the United States will find itself in a crisis in cyberspace, with the escalation of tensions associated with a major cyberattack, suspicions that one has taken place, or fears that it might do so soon. The genesis for this work was the broader issue of how the Air Force should integrate kinetic and nonkinetic operations. Central to this process was careful consideration of how escalation options and risks should be treated, which, in turn, demanded a broader consideration across the entire crisis-management spectrum. Such crises can be managed by taking steps to reduce the incentives for other states to step into crisis, by controlling the narrative, understanding the stability parameters of the crises, and trying to manage escalation if conflicts arise from crises.
Cybercrises Can Be Managed with Multiple Strategies
- Parties can reduce incentives for other states to get involved should a crisis arise.
- Parties can control narratives.
- Decisionmakers should ensure that they understand the parameters of the crisis.
- Each party is responsible for managing escalation should conflict arise.
- The Air Force should find ways of conveying to others that its missions can be carried out in the face of a full-fledged cyberattack.
- The Air Force needs to watch carefully the messages and signals it sends out about its operations, both explicit and implicit.
- Air Force operations should support rather than contradict the United States' master narrative about cybercrises.
- The Air Force should clearly differentiate between cyberwar operations that can be subsumed under kinetic operations and those that cannot.
- Air Force planners need a precise understanding of how their potential adversaries would perceive the escalatory aspect of potential offensive operations.
- The Air Force should develop itself as an independent source of expertise on cyberwar.