A Description of the Enlisted Service Rotation System
Published 1979
Published 1979
Describes the services’ enlisted rotation policies and related management problems. Military personnel generally perceive non-CONUS assignments as undesirable, and constraints within certain occupational fields exacerbate the effects of rotating specialists. Service-wide sentiments against non-CONUS tours are greatest when occupational fields have detrimental rotational patterns. Geographical imbalances require assigning a disproportionate number of the specialty population out of the United States. Tour categories may also be imbalanced. These interrelated conditions may lower both retention rates and productivity of the remaining specialists. As well as direct costs, there are indirect costs of higher training and recruiting rates and productivity losses created by larger pipelines, more frequent start-up times, and poor morale. Service personnel managers have suggested extended leave for voluntary extensions in non-CONUS tours and bonuses for undesirable locations. Any incentive system should increase the effective length of non-CONUS tours, thereby lessening rotation base requirements and management problems.
This publication is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported miscellaneous outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.