Screening survey audit report for site I
Published 1981
The screening survey administered in Brown County, Wisconsin, as part of the Housing Assistance Supply Experiment, provided data on a large sample of residential properties for stratification, and on housing characteristics needed to set program standards. The survey completion rate was 86 percent, which meant 8,646 field-complete interviews. The audit report evaluated the reliability of the data and identified problems in survey instruments, field procedures, and data processing that may be correctable in later surveys. Nonresponse bias was not considered significant except for certain questions on household income, but audit procedures identified 2,182 out of 427,414 responses as implausible. Sample validity was tested by comparing population estimates based on survey records with corresponding figures from the 1970 Census of Housing. Relationships among variables of household and housing unit characteristics received preliminary analysis pending more detailed data.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1981
- Pages: 183
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/pubs
- Document Number: N-1068-HUD
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported miscellaneous outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.