Recommendations to HUD on whether additional survey cycles should be conducted in Site I of the Housing Assistance Supply Experiment, Brown County, Wisconsin. Three cycles have been completed there, and although some important experimental purposes are served by the data in hand, conclusions based on only 18 months of postenrollment data could be attacked as inadequate or misleading. RAND recommends conducting the fourth cycle as the final survey wave, thus extending the analysis period by 67 percent. Data from the fourth cycle would cover a year in which the number of allowance recipients increased by 43 percent and the total allowance payments by 70 percent. Additional data for Site I would also help with analysis of events in Site II (St. Joseph County, Indiana) and with other housing policy research.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.