Cover: Audit of thebaseline landlord survey in site II

Audit of thebaseline landlord survey in site II

Published 1979

by Richard E. Stanton, Therman P. Britt

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback183 pages $40.00

Assesses the completeness and reliability of data collected in the baseline (1974) landlord survey in St. Joseph County, Indiana (Site II of the Housing Assistance Supply Experiment). Survey fieldwork yielded 1915 field-complete landlord survey records for an overall sample completion rate of 63 percent. After interview validation, every item in the survey instrument was checked for respondent applicability and for erroneous entries. To select a smaller sample that would meet analytical needs, a separate audit was made of the reported revenues, expenses, and debt status of each property. The resulting sample of 1182 "revenue and expense complete" records was judged to be complete and reliable in all entries needed to construct financial accounts for baseline revenue and expense analysis. After a statistically significant bias, due to record selection, had been corrected, each record was weighted to obtain a joint representation of the full county population of unsubsidized rental properties containing permanent, complete housing units.

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.