Traces the housing actions of enrollees in the experimental allowance program--4,213 in Brown County, Wisconsin, and 5,782 in St. Joseph County, Indiana--taken to qualify for payment during the first two years. The primary analytic device is a decision tree of housing allowance office (HAO) actions and client decisions. Among the findings: (1) about half the dwellings occupied by the applicants were acceptable to HAO and nearly all enrollees in acceptable (certifiable) dwellings stayed there and began receiving payments; (2) two-thirds of those in unacceptable dwellings repaired, one-tenth moved, and over one-fifth terminated; (3) the worst dwellings were least likely to be repaired; (4) few who failed to achieve certification tried very hard to do so; and (5) certification was most likely for low-income, elderly homeowners.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.