Cover: Controlling errors in allowance program administration

Controlling errors in allowance program administration

Published 1979

by Paul E. Tebbets

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback98 pages $30.00

Analyzes error rates and error control methods in administering the experimental housing allowance program, based on records of the housing allowance offices (HAOs), which enroll clients, evaluate their dwellings, and disburse allowance payments. Interview protocols and documentation requirements help prevent errors in data on client income and household status. Most errors made are later corrected by reviewing enrollment forms and verifying a sample of undocumented information with third parties. Housing evaluators incorrectly pass or fail a dwelling in less than 2 percent of the cases, and independent auditors have found only negligible errors in HAO records. The net error rate in both experimental sites is estimated at less than one percent of the average annual allowance payment. Few clients complain about the rigorous error control methods. Further research will examine whether their administrative cost (now somewhat higher than the amount they save) can be reduced without significant increases in error rates.

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.