Appendix C to Summary Report

New Measures of Diabetic Patient Behavior, Knowledge, and Attitudes

by Kent H. Marquis, John E. Ware, Daniel A. Relles


Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback148 pages $35.00 $28.00 20% Web Discount

Describes and evaluates newly developed questionnaire measures of diabetic patient behavior, knowledge, and attitudes using internal consistency, retest, informant, medical record, and skill demonstration data. Of 26 new behavior scales developed, only 3 met all reliability, validity, and bias requirements, 11 showed serious measurement problems that will be difficult to correct and the remaining 12 scales show promise but need further development. Of 21 new knowledge scales, 12 met internal consistency criteria but further use should await validity evaluations. Preliminary attitude measurement findings are given. Patient behavioral compliance was found to be multidimensional: compliance with one self-care requirement did not predict compliance with other requirements. On the other hand, knowledge (and possibly attitude) data appear to have fewer dimensions so measurement can be more efficient. (Appendix C to R-2480.)

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.