A collection of thoughts and opinions on factors that the authors believe will affect attempts to (1) integrate quality assurance activities within the health services system, (2) perform such activities, and (3) evaluate their effectiveness. Although many factors--economic, political, and social--will influence the climate within which efforts to evaluate and improve quality of medical care take place, the most important is the current move toward cost containment. Issues such as making cost-benefit tradeoffs and defining the focus of medical care will be difficult to resolve, say the authors. However, in their view, these tradeoffs and definitions can be made successfully, with the help of patients and nonhealth professionals, and a viable equilibrium between cost containment and quality of health care can be achieved.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.