School Finance Capitalization

Aaron S. Gurwitz

Published 1980

Any major reform of school finance will almost certainly bring about change in property values. This Note explains why this effect should occur, reports the econometric evidence that it will occur and discusses the implications of the phenomenon for the analysis of reform proposals. School finance reform is seen to have two objectives: taxpayer equity and expenditure equity. The analysis presented in this Note suggests that the issue of taxpayer inequity is not as clear-cut as some analysts and courts appear to have believed. The effect should be to raise the importance of issues in expenditures equity and the effect of school finance systems on children as opposed to taxpayers. Furthermore, we have identified the source of taxpayer inequity to be barriers to residential mobility and perfect price adjustment. Future school finance should direct some attention to these issues.

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1980
  • Pages: 43
  • Document Number: N-1312-FF

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Gurwitz, Aaron S., School Finance Capitalization. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1980. https://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N1312.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported miscellaneous outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.