Evolution of the Regulation of High Cost Gas Supplies

W. F. Hederman

Published 1980

This analysis examines the impasse that has developed in the formulation of a federal regulatory policy for facilities to manufacture synthetic natural gas (SNG) from coal. No policy presented to date is acceptable to both regulators and private parties whose support is needed to build and operate such facilities. The regulatory approaches taken by the Federal Power Commission and its successor, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), in considering proposals for liquefied natural gas import and coal gasification projects provide the basis for this analysis. By pursuing opportunities for compromise, federal regulators could, without any major economic inefficiencies, provide insights to both the FERC and the Department of Energy about whether or not coal gasification represents a desirable way to achieve either agency's goals.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1980
  • Pages: 57
  • Document Number: N-1435-DOE

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Hederman, W. F., Evolution of the Regulation of High Cost Gas Supplies. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1980. https://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N1435.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported miscellaneous outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.