Pilot Urban Impact Analysis

HUD Conventional Low Rent Public Housing and Section 23 Leased Housing Programs

by Robert Dubinsky


Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 3.2 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback75 pages $25.00 $20.00 20% Web Discount

Analyzes the urban impacts of HUD's conventional Public Housing and Section 23 Leased Housing programs. After placing the programs in historical context the Note analyzes how they work; how program funds are distributed geographically, as well as how the programs (1) affect the availability of housing, the character of neighborhoods and the fiscal circumstances of local government, (2) provide employment and income opportunities, and (3) benefit particular population groups. HUD's ability to change or improve the allocation of benefits to people or places is severely limited, but the Note suggests some issues and problems that need to be considered in developing future policy. Public housing should be considered within the context of an overall HUD-assisted housing policy which must address the issues of program cost and equity and, given finite resources, how the mix between housing quality and number of beneficiaries should be apportioned.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.