Measurement of Health and Nutrition Effects of Large-Scale Nutrition Intervention Projects
ResearchPublished 1980
ResearchPublished 1980
Increasingly, the nutritional impact of complex intervention packages is being sought. Typically, these complex interventions include intentional changes in the economic, social, and political environment as well as in medical and nutritional factors. This paper is concerned with the critical issue of the choice of indicators necessary to evaluate these complex interventions with multiple treatments. The authors first argue that large-scale, complex interventions require knowledge about indicator variables that is likely to emerge only from careful evaluations of simple interventions. They then discuss a set of optimal properties for field indicators of nutrition and health. These properties have implications for the design and evaluation of interventions. In light of these implications, the authors review the few evaluations of nutrition interventions reported in the literature in order to assess the knowledge now available for structuring complex, large-scale interventions. Finally, they explore problems of design and measurement peculiar to interventions with multiple treatment.
This publication is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported miscellaneous outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.