Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 5.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback163 pages $40.00 $32.00 20% Web Discount

This Note presents the results of a four-month RAND study undertaken to provide the City of Los Angeles with technical assistance in preparing an Environmental Impact Report relating to a permanent rent control law. Using current data and theory, the Note estimates the impact of the existing rent control law on the supply of rental housing services in Los Angeles and the extent of secondary effects. It also estimates the impact of several alternative policies the city might adopt after the current law expires in 1982. Section II discusses the characteristics of and trends in the Los Angeles housing market. Section III reviews the history and nature of the Los Angeles rent control law, comparing it with other rent control laws in the Los Angeles region and in the nation, and also discusses alternatives to the current Los Angeles law. Section IV analyzes the primary impact of those alternatives. Section V analyzes the secondary impacts. Conclusions, presented in the last section, take the form of year-by-year effects of alternative rent control laws.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.