Austerity in Public Medical Care Programs

Miserliness or Economic Response?

by Joseph P. Newhouse


Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.4 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback14 pages $15.00 $12.00 20% Web Discount

Recent American cutbacks in public medical care programs are often assumed to reflect the conservative ideology of the Reagan Administration, but may in fact reflect the slowed growth of real income and the continuing rise in medical care prices. Moreover, the reductions in Medicaid may well be greater than in Medicare because of the greater secondary benefits of the latter (benefits to spouses and children). The concept of secondary benefits may also explain why old-age pensions are difficult to reduce, but long-term care is widely perceived as not well supported.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.