Cover: Jury Awards and Prejudgment Interest in Tort Cases

Jury Awards and Prejudgment Interest in Tort Cases

Published 1983

by Stephen J. Carroll


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.7 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback58 pages $23.00

This Note reports the preliminary results of research which empirically examines issues central to the prejudgment interest policy debate. The work thus far establishes that juries are implicitly awarding prejudgment interest. The analysis is based on data on all awards returned in civil jury trials in the federal, state, and municipal courts in Cook County, Illinois, from 1960 to 1979 relating to injuries arising from automobile accidents (1,349 cases). Controlling for the severity of injury, it was found that, on average, juries increased awards over and above inflation as measured by the Consumer Price Index at a rate of 3.7 percent per year for the time between injury and trial. Overall, juries implicitly provide prejudgment interest at a rate equal to the underlying inflation rate plus 3.7 percent per year. The Note addresses the implication of these effects for the policy debate about prejudgment interest.

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.