Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.6 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback54 pages $23.00 $18.40 20% Web Discount

Time-of-use (TOU) electricity rates generally require added metering costs; therefore, introducing TOU rates presents a legitimate issue in benefit/cost comparison. Furthermore, the PURPA standard of the 1978 National Energy Act requires such a comparison. This Note articulates the appropriate criteria for evaluating a switch to TOU rates from a non-TOU rate structure. It presents the case for a measure based on welfare economics, employing changes in consumer surplus and producer surplus, and contrasts that criterion with one based on changes in utility costs, as measured by either fuel savings or fuel and capital savings. The Note provides a practical illustration using residential load data to demonstrate the evaluation error that results from a fuel savings criterion. Empirical estimates of price responsiveness by residential customers are drawn from the Los Angeles Electricity Rate Study, published in Sanford V. Berg (ed.), Innovative Electricity Rates: Issues in Cost-Benefit Analysis, Lexington Books, 1983.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.