Scientific and Technical Information Transfer
Issues and Options
ResearchPublished 1984
Issues and Options
ResearchPublished 1984
In this study the authors consider ways to more effectively transfer to potential users the knowledge produced by federally funded research in science and technology. Federal policymakers are concerned that the information created through the billions of R&D dollars spent annually by the federal government is not well utilized because of inadequacies in information transfer between the research and user communities. They propose a number of options for improving information transfer which emphasize increasing the selectivity, interactivity, and user-responsiveness of existing formal dissemination systems and on coupling them more closely to informal systems. Specific proposals include: technology-intensive options which take advantage of the special properties of interactive computer and communications technologies; supply-side options which seek to improve dissemination processes from the information supply side, either with or without electronic technology; and user-focused options directed to strengthening the ability of users themselves to access and evaluate information.
This publication is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported miscellaneous outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.