Cover: Case Studies of U.S. Service Trade in Japan

Case Studies of U.S. Service Trade in Japan

Published 1984

by Arthur J. Alexander, Hong W. Tan


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 6.3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback128 pages $35.00

This Note describes and examines the sources of barriers to U.S. trade in Japan in several service industries. The authors used a case-study research strategy that combined interviews with people in industry and government in Japan and the United States; review of trade journals and scholarly studies; and collection and analysis of independent data. The case studies were on banking and securities, insurance, law, accounting, data communications, and advertising. Among their conclusions, the authors found that the most important barriers to trade in services arise from government regulation of business, and that the U.S. government is more likely to be successful in moving Japan toward deregulation when there are strong domestic forces for change in Japan. A related RAND report, R-3175, Barriers to U.S. Service Trade in Japan, synthesizes and integrates the findings of the case studies and draws policy conclusions.

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.