Superfund Remedial Program Improvement Options

Evaluation Design

by Christopher W. Myers, Arthur J. Alexander, James S. Hodges

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback59 pages $23.00 $18.40 20% Web Discount

This Note describes a proposed research design to evaluate certain changes developed by the Environmental Protection Agency for operating and managing the Superfund remedial program to clean up uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. The Note outlines considerations in designing an appropriate pilot evaluation framework, including site selection and performance criteria for two of the proposed Superfund remedial program improvements. Based on current information, the findings suggest that any effort to evaluate pilot changes in the remedial program should (1) develop a better understanding of the factors (e.g., site characteristics, management policies) driving project outcomes (e.g., cost, cost growth, schedule slippage); (2) draw a sample of sites representative of the population of sites for which inferences are needed; and (3) within strata, assign sites randomly to pilot or control groups.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.