Cover: Medicaid Second Surgical Opinion Programs and Inpatient Hospital Review Programs

Medicaid Second Surgical Opinion Programs and Inpatient Hospital Review Programs

Results of a 1987 Survey

Published 1989

by Phoebe Lindsey Barton


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.9 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback60 pages $23.00

In 1986, concerned about stemming the steady increase in health care costs, Congress mandated a study of state Medicaid utilization review programs that would identify high-volume and high-cost procedures, the payment rates for such procedures, the rates at which such procedures are performed, and the number of board-certified or board-eligible physicians who perform such procedures. In addition, for states that have mandatory second surgical opinion programs (SSOPs) or inpatient hospital preadmission review programs, the study was required to determine the extent to which such programs impede access to care for Medicaid patients. This Note reports the results of the 1987 survey of all state Medicaid agencies, including the District of Columbia, regarding Medicaid SSOPs and programs of inpatient hospital preadmission review.

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.