Cover: Assessing the Accuracy of Normal Approximations

Assessing the Accuracy of Normal Approximations

Published 1988

by James S. Hodges


Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.6 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback6 pages $20.00

The widespread applicability and use of normal approximations creates a need for methods for assessing their accuracy in an operational fashion. This Note presents two new methods based on a comparison of the level curves of an exact likelihood with the level curves of the usual normal approximation to it and on a comparison of selected line integrals of an exact density and a normal approximation to it. The operational usefulness of these methods is compared with the operational usefulness of two well-known existing approaches to the accuracy of approximations, namely convergence rates and the curvature methods of D.M. Bates and D.G. Watts.

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This research in the public interest was supported by RAND, using discretionary funds made possible by the generosity of RAND's donors, the fees earned on client-funded research, and independent research and development (IR&D) funds provided by the Department of Defense.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.