Second Surgical Opinion Programs

A Review of the Literature

Phoebe Lindsey Barton, Joseph P. Newhouse

ResearchPublished 1989

Congressional interest in second surgical opinion programs (SSOPs) as one method to reduce the cost of health care dates from the mid-1970s. The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (P.L. 99-509) of 1986 mandated a report by the Secretary of Health and Human Services to Congress on utilization review in Medicaid agencies. The report was to assess SSOPs and inpatient hospital preadmission review programs, including whether such programs impede access to care. This Note, a critical review of the literature on SSOPs, was developed as background information for the Secretary's report. It considers (1) whether SSOPs are effective mechanisms for reducing health care costs and (2) how SSOPs affect outcomes of patient care. The authors also discuss how the literature addresses a number of concerns on access and quality that are included in Section 9432 of P.L. 99-509.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
70 pages
List Price
$25.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1989
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 70
  • Paperback Price: $25.00
  • Document Number: N-2797-HCFA

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Barton, Phoebe Lindsey and Joseph P. Newhouse, Second Surgical Opinion Programs: A Review of the Literature, RAND Corporation, N-2797-HCFA, 1989. As of September 25, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N2797.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Barton, Phoebe Lindsey and Joseph P. Newhouse, Second Surgical Opinion Programs: A Review of the Literature. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1989. https://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N2797.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported miscellaneous outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.