Cover: Second Surgical Opinion Programs

Second Surgical Opinion Programs

A Review of the Literature

Published 1989

by Phoebe Lindsey Barton, Joseph P. Newhouse

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 2.9 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback70 pages $25.00

Congressional interest in second surgical opinion programs (SSOPs) as one method to reduce the cost of health care dates from the mid-1970s. The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (P.L. 99-509) of 1986 mandated a report by the Secretary of Health and Human Services to Congress on utilization review in Medicaid agencies. The report was to assess SSOPs and inpatient hospital preadmission review programs, including whether such programs impede access to care. This Note, a critical review of the literature on SSOPs, was developed as background information for the Secretary's report. It considers (1) whether SSOPs are effective mechanisms for reducing health care costs and (2) how SSOPs affect outcomes of patient care. The authors also discuss how the literature addresses a number of concerns on access and quality that are included in Section 9432 of P.L. 99-509.

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.