Resolution of Mass Torts

Toward a Framework for Evaluation of Aggregative Procedures

by Mark A. Peterson, Molly Selvin


Full Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 4.3 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 FormatList Price Price
Add to Cart Paperback91 pages $30.00 $24.00 20% Web Discount

The civil justice system is increasingly being asked to resolve disputes between large aggregations of plaintiffs and defendants. This mass litigation is placing considerable strain on a system whose formal and informal procedures and practices are based on expectations about traditional disputants that no longer necessarily hold. Some formal mechanisms, such as class actions and multidistricting, have been devised to deal with certain classes of mass litigation, but there are questions about when and how they should be applied. This Note presents the Institute for Civil Justice's (ICJ) agenda for a program of research on mass tort litigation, and the results of ICJ work to date. The analysis explores the effects of aggregation on the characteristics, course, and outcome of mass litigation.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation Note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.