Report
An Economic Framework for Analyzing DoD Profit Policy
Jan 1, 1992
A Comparison of Empirical Studies
Format | File Size | Notes |
---|---|---|
PDF file | 1.2 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Format | List Price | Price | |
---|---|---|---|
Add to Cart | Paperback39 pages | $20.00 | $16.00 20% Web Discount |
This Note uses economic models and concepts to analyze the incentive effects of the Defense Department's (DoD's) policy on independent research and development (IR&D). IR&D is research and development conducted by contractors out of their own resources, a portion of which is later reimbursed by DoD. The Note compares the empirical results of three studies that consider the ways in which DoD policy affects the level of private spending on IR&D. In particular, it compares the varying methods, assumptions, and datasets used in these studies to determine how consistent their results are and, when taken together, what they can tell policymakers about the likely effects of changes in IR&D policy. The findings indicate that currently available empirical studies do not allow policymakers to predict how policy changes would affect private investment in IR&D.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.