Cover: The Effects of Military Advertising

The Effects of Military Advertising

Evidence from the Advertising Mix Test

Published 1989

by James N. Dertouzos

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.6 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback50 pages $23.00

Advertising is one of the central recruiting tools used by the military services in support of the all-volunteer force. This Note analyzes the effects of advertising on recruiting, providing quantitative estimates of the relative effectiveness of Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and joint advertising programs. The findings indicate that, in general, the services gain enlistments from additional advertising, and the gains of any one branch do not seem to come at the expense (in terms of lost recruits) of any other. Not only are there no important interservice competitive effects of advertising, but the advertising done by a service apparently confers important benefits on the other branches as well. Consequently, both service and joint advertising appear to be powerful tools to help meet the recruiting requirements of the all-volunteer armed forces.

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.