Cover: Strategic Thought at RAND, 1948-1963

Strategic Thought at RAND, 1948-1963

The Ideas, Their Origins, Their Fates

Published 1990

by James Digby

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback42 pages $23.00

Drawing on personal recollections, documents, discussions, and interviews, the author presents an account of how a gifted group of scientists and analysts that had gathered at the young RAND Corporation learned about military strategy, with emphasis on the new field of nuclear strategy. Many in this group made important and enduring contributions. With a focus on certain significant ideas developed at RAND, most relating directly to the deterrence and control of war, the author considers their influence and lasting effects on how people think about war and strategy and their validity for the future.

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This research in the public interest was supported by RAND, using discretionary funds made possible by the generosity of RAND's donors, the fees earned on client-funded research, and independent research and development (IR&D) funds provided by the Department of Defense.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.