Intensive Supervision for High-Risk Probationers: Findings from Three California Experiments
Jan 1, 1990
Results of an Experiment in Oregon
|PDF file||2 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
|Add to Cart||Paperback57 pages||$23.00||$18.40 20% Web Discount|
As prisons across the country become more crowded, jurisdictions have been instituting intensive supervision programs (ISPs) — programs designed to be more punitive and stringent than regular probation, but less expensive and brutal than prison. ISPs are generally of two types: prison diversion or probation/parole enhancement. This Note presents the results of an evaluation of an ISP implemented by Marion County, Oregon, which documents a number of important lessons regarding implementing a prison-diversion ISP. At the end of the experimental evaluation, 14 offenders had been randomly assigned to the ISP, and 14 had been assigned to prison. This number was far fewer than originally planned, due to implementation difficulties which are fully discussed in the text. The ISP appeared to deliver close to the stated number of surveillance contacts as outlined in the ISP plan; however, the extent of offender participation in rehabilitative services such as counseling, drug treatment, and community service, was not as high as expected. More disappointing was the status of offenders one year after assignment: None of the experimental offenders remained in the ISP. Cost estimates suggest that ISP costs are about 75 percent of the costs of sending offenders to prison.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.