Cover: Differences among Hospitals in Medicare Patient Mortality

Differences among Hospitals in Medicare Patient Mortality

Published 1989

by Mark R. Chassin, Rolla Edward Park, Kathleen N. Lohr, Joan Keesey, Robert H. Brook


Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.5 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback31 pages $20.00

Using hospital discharge abstract data for fiscal year 1984 for all acute-care hospitals treating Medicare patients, the authors measured four mortality rates: inpatient deaths, deaths within 30 days of discharge, and deaths within two fixed periods following admission (30 days, and the 95th percentile length of stay for each condition). The metric of interest was the probability that a hospital would have as many deaths as it did (taking age, race, and sex into account). Differences among hospitals in inpatient death rates were large and significant for 22 of 48 specific conditions studied and for all conditions together. The authors compared pairs of conditions in terms of hospital rankings by probability of observed numbers of inpatient deaths; they found relatively low correlations for most comparisons except between a few surgical conditions. When they compared different pairs of the four death measures, the correlations were moderate to high. Data on hospital death rates cannot now be used to draw inferences about quality of care. The magnitude of variability in death rates, however, argues for further study of hospital death rates.

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.