Generating Tritium Using Civilian Reactors
A Preliminary Evaluation of Alternative Concepts
Download eBook for Free
|PDF file||1.3 MB||
Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.
Purchase Print Copy
|Add to Cart||Paperback36 pages||$20.00||$16.00 20% Web Discount|
The unintentional moratorium on tritium production in the United States began in early 1989. The continuing hiatus could affect government thinking, strategy, and action in three time frames. In the short term, strategies and tactical arms control might reduce the demand for tritium sufficiently to offset the decaying tritium supply. Since the time this Note was published, this very much appears to be the case. In the mid term, an interest is emerging in using civilian nuclear reactors to generate tritium. In the long term, a continuing hiatus in tritium production could bolster support for DoE plans to replace the aging Savannah River facilities. Since the time this Note was published, there has been and will likely continue to be a substantially decreasing nuclear weapons stockpile. Therefore, the decision of if and when to replace Savannah River could be postponed a number of years.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Note series. The note was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.