Cover: Malpractice Claims Data as a Quality Improvement Tool

Malpractice Claims Data as a Quality Improvement Tool

I. Epidemiology of Error in Four Specialties

Published 1991

by Richard L. Kravitz, John E. Rolph, Kimberly A. McGuigan

Download

Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.7 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback6 pages $20.00

This Note attempts to identify potentially preventable sources of medical injury in obstetrics and gynecology, general surgery, anesthesiology, and radiology. It is based on a retrospective review of physician malpractice claim records of a large New Jersey insurer of physicians practicing in those specialties during any portion of the period between 1977 and 1989. The authors examined the proportion of claims due to negligence associated with errors in (1) patient management, (2) technical performance, and (3) medical and nursing staff coordination, and considered the clinical and financial consequences of such errors. Among 1,371 claims ascribed to negligence, patient management errors were cited most frequently in all four specialties (48-75 percent) and, compared with performance and coordination problems, were generally associated with a higher frequency of serious injury and higher median payments. Coordination problems accounted for about 9 percent of claims. In obstetrics and gynecology, newborn delivery claims usually arose from management errors (57-68 percent), whereas gynecologic procedure claims were most often associated with performance errors (55-73 percent). Underperformance of cesarean section was cited more frequently than overperformance (31 percent vs. 3 percent). General surgery claims were about equally divided between management and performance types regardless of procedure. Failure to perform appropriate diagnostic testing or monitoring was the main problem in 3-8 percent of claims. The authors conclude that malpractice data can be used to identify problem-prone clinical processes and suggest interventions that may reduce negligence.

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.