Cover: Direct Measurement of Three Stylistic Dimensions of National Institutes of Health Consensus Statements

Direct Measurement of Three Stylistic Dimensions of National Institutes of Health Consensus Statements

Published 1992

by James P. Kahan, Peter Noehrenberg, Hilary Farris, Elizabeth Yano


Download Free Electronic Document

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 0.8 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.


Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback24 pages $20.00

The Consensus Development Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) publicly evaluates scientific information concerning biomedical technologies. Since 1977, the program has issued over 80 consensus statements on a wide range of medical topics. An earlier RAND content analysis of 24 consensus statements showed that consensus statements varied in three ways: (1) discursive statements attempt to present a full description of the technology and the context surrounding its use; (2) directive statements attempt to formulate the findings of the conference in terms of guidelines for health care practitioners; and (3) scholarly statements attempt to review the research on the technology. This Note considers whether the qualities of discursiveness, directiveness, and scholarliness can be directly measured by a straightforward rating scale. Results showed that straightforward ratings only moderately replicated the content analysis; however, these ratings had an internal reliability and consistency. Therefore, NIH should not abandon direct ratings. If direct ratings are to be obtained, they should be done by group discussion rather than by individual raters. Raters should be at least partially familiar with the entire set of medical technologies to be rated and should be comfortable with the concept of Likert-type rating scales.

This report is part of the RAND note series. The note was a product of RAND from 1979 to 1993 that reported other outputs of sponsored research for general distribution.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.