Over the past 20 twenty years, globalization, consolidation, information technology, and litigation financing have begun to change the way that many legal services are provided in the United States. The innovations that have occurred have often been influenced by experiences elsewhere, as in the case of traditional prohibitions on litigation financing, for which the United Kingdom and Australia have led the way in relaxing rules. The same globalization and offshoring of information services that have occurred in accounting, product support, and medical transcription have begun to occur in legal services. Yet numerous restrictions on the provision of legal services — from traditional restrictions on litigation and firm financing to the requirement that a legal provider be a licensed attorney in a particular state — limit the kinds of innovation that are permissible. The authors present a framework for examining recent and ongoing innovations in legal services in the United States. The purpose of this framework is to aid policymakers in understanding the likely effects of innovations and the role of policy in promoting or deterring innovation, and to provide criteria that policymakers might use to decide whether the advantages of an innovation justify loosening existing restrictions. The authors also discuss the further research and data infrastructure necessary to aid policymakers in understanding whether existing restrictions should be altered.
Table of Contents
The Existing Legal System in the United States
A Framework for Analyzing Innovation in Legal Services
The Potential for Innovation in Legal Services: Examples and Research Questions