Innovations in the Provision of Legal Services in the United States
An Overview for Policymakers
Download eBook for Free
|PDF file||0.3 MB|
|PDF file||0.1 MB|
Over the past 20 twenty years, globalization, consolidation, information technology, and litigation financing have begun to change the way that many legal services are provided in the United States. The innovations that have occurred have often been influenced by experiences elsewhere, as in the case of traditional prohibitions on litigation financing, for which the United Kingdom and Australia have led the way in relaxing rules. The same globalization and offshoring of information services that have occurred in accounting, product support, and medical transcription have begun to occur in legal services. Yet numerous restrictions on the provision of legal services — from traditional restrictions on litigation and firm financing to the requirement that a legal provider be a licensed attorney in a particular state — limit the kinds of innovation that are permissible. The authors present a framework for examining recent and ongoing innovations in legal services in the United States. The purpose of this framework is to aid policymakers in understanding the likely effects of innovations and the role of policy in promoting or deterring innovation, and to provide criteria that policymakers might use to decide whether the advantages of an innovation justify loosening existing restrictions. The authors also discuss the further research and data infrastructure necessary to aid policymakers in understanding whether existing restrictions should be altered.
Table of Contents
The Existing Legal System in the United States
A Framework for Analyzing Innovation in Legal Services
The Potential for Innovation in Legal Services: Examples and Research Questions
This research was sponsored by the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation and was conducted within the Kauffman-RAND Institute for Entrepreneurship Public Policy, which is housed within RAND Law, Business, and Regulation.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Occasional paper series. RAND occasional papers may include an informed perspective on a timely policy issue, a discussion of new research methodologies, essays, a paper presented at a conference, or a summary of work in progress. All RAND occasional papers undergo rigorous peer review to help ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.