The authors look at four trade policy options for Japan and the United States. They evaluate each option for each country based on its impact on international relations and economic growth and its political and practical feasibility and conclude that the best option for both nations is to move forward cooperatively with the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement.
Download
Download eBook for Free
Full Document
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 0.3 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Summary Only
| Format | File Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| PDF file | 0.1 MB | Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience. |
Purchase
Purchase Print Copy
| Format | List Price | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Add to Cart | Paperback56 pages | $17.00 | $13.60 20% Web Discount |
Research Questions
- What types of trade cooperation options between Japan and the United States would be politically and practically feasible?
- What benefits would the Trans-Pacific Partnership have for the two countries?
The direction charted by two of the world's largest economies and biggest advocates of unfettered global trade — Japan and the United States — will have a profound impact on the fate of the free trade regime. This paper examines the factors that influenced Japan's decision to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the U.S. decision to make the TPP a focus of its trade policy. The authors look at four options for the two nations:
- working together to restart the multilateral Doha Round of the World Trade Organization (WTO),
- signing a bilateral free trade agreement (FTA),
- participating in the formation of the multilateral, regional TPP, and
- pursuing independent trade strategies.
They evaluate each option based on its impact on international relations and economic growth and its political and practical feasibility, and conclude that moving forward with TPP negotiations is the best option is for both countries.
Key Findings
Japan's decision to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations was the right one, and U.S. policymakers should welcome Japanese participation in the TPP.
- Participation in the TPP will provide Japan with an opportunity to strengthen its ties to the United States without risking a repeat of the bilateral trade friction of the 1980s.
- Although it is unclear what the short-run impact of joining the TPP will mean for the United States or Japan, they may already be benefiting from their participation insofar as the TPP has caused global business to see them as more attractive destinations for investment.
- The long-run economic impact of the TPP promises to be significant if participants can bring most import tariffs down to zero.
The economies in the United States and Japan are both in need of outside stimulus to propel them forward.
- A commitment to the TPP could provide at least a temporary economic boost.
- If the TPP fulfills its promise to be comprehensive and broad-based, it should generate significant longer-term stimulus.
Table of Contents
Chapter One
Introduction
Chapter Two
The Trans-Pacific Partnership
Chapter Three
The Effects of Trade Liberalization
Chapter Four
The U.S. Economic Policy Environment
Chapter Five
The U.S. Political Environment
Chapter Six
The Japanese Economic Policy Environment
Chapter Seven
The Japanese Political Environment
Chapter Eight
Assessing Trade Policy Options
Chapter Nine
Conclusion
Research conducted by
The research described in this report was sponsored by The Japan Foundation Center for Global Partnership and was conducted within the RAND Center for Asia Pacific Policy (CAPP) under the auspices of the International Programs of the RAND Corporation.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Occasional paper series. RAND occasional papers may include an informed perspective on a timely policy issue, a discussion of new research methodologies, essays, a paper presented at a conference, or a summary of work in progress. All RAND occasional papers undergo rigorous peer review to help ensure that they meet high standards for research quality and objectivity.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.