Sequential decision problems with a limited memory.

Michael B. Marcus

Expert InsightsPublished 1957

A study based on the idea of sequential decision problems with a limited memory, taken from Herbert Robbins' paper, A Sequential Decision Problem with a Finite Memory. In these problems a random identically distributed sequence of Bernoulli trials occurs with a fixed probability p; p is unknown. An experimenter tries to predict, prior to the happening of each event, what the event will be. To aid his prediction the experimenter knows the outcome of the preceding r events and the guesses he made concerning them. He attempts to optimize the proportion of times he guesses correctly over an infinite number of guesses.

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1957
  • Pages: 14
  • Document Number: P-1201

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

Marcus, Michael B., Sequential decision problems with a limited memory. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1957. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P1201.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.