Cover: On the Epistemology of the Inexact Sciences

On the Epistemology of the Inexact Sciences

Published 1958

by Olaf Helmer-Hirschberg, Nicholas H. Rescher

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 3.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback72 pages $15.00

An outline of a new epistemological approach to the inexact sciences, which include applied physical sciences such as engineering or medicine as well as most of the social sciences. The purpose of all sciences is to explain past events and to predict future events in an objective manner. In the exact sciences explanation and prediction have the same logical structure. However, in the inexact sciences specifically predictive instrumentalities in these fields and various mehtodological innovations must be considered. Among these are the systematic use of expert judgment and pseudoexperimentation, involving simulation processes and operational gaming.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.