Cover: Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention

Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention

Published 1959

by Kenneth Arrow

Download

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Purchase

Purchase Print Copy

 Format Price
Add to Cart Paperback25 pages $15.00

A discourse on invention, defined broadly as the production of knowledge. From the viewpoint of welfare economics, determining optimal resource allocation for invention will depend on the technological characteristics of the invention process and on the nature of the market for knowledge. It is shown that the competitive system fails to achieve an optimal resource allocation in the case of invention because of increasing returns, inappropriability, and uncertainty. For an optimal allocation to invention, it is necessary for the government or some other agency not governed by profit-and-loss criteria to finance research and invention.

This report is part of the RAND paper series. The paper was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.