The accuracy of winds derived by the radar tracking of chaff at high altitudes.
Expert InsightsPublished 1960
A discussion of the accuracy and significance of wind measurements made by radar tracking of high-altitude chaff in the vicinity of Johnston Island, July-August 1958. The manner in which the chaff responds to changes in the wind is deduced from the observed rates of fall. The standard error of the wind determination caused by random errors of tracking is estimated statistically. It is shown that day-to-day variations of the wind at a level are detectable with this type of measurement, but that day-to-day variations of the shear are masked by instrumental error. The mean shear over the three-day period, however, is found to be real and may be caused by a change in wind regime associated with the temperature minimum near 80 km.
Document Details
- Copyright: RAND Corporation
- Availability: Web Only
- Year: 1960
- Pages: 25
- Document Number: P-1879
Citation
RAND Style Manual
Chicago Manual of Style
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.