Variational methods in problems of control and programming
ResearchPublished 1961
ResearchPublished 1961
A paper which shows how a fairly general control problem, or programming problem, with constrints can be reduced to a special type of classical Bolza problem in the calculus of variations. Necessary conditions from the Bolza problem are translated into necessary conditions for optimal control. It is seen from these conditions that Pontryagin's maximum principle is a translation of the usual Weierstrass condition, and is applicable to a wider class of problems than that considreed by Pontryagin. The differentiability and continuity properties of the value of the control are estabilished under reasonable hypotheses on the synthesis, and it is shown that the value satisfies the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. As a consequence, a rigorous proof of a functional equation of Bellman is obtained that is valid for a much wider class of problems than hertofore considered. A sufficiency theorem for synthesis of control is also given.
This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.