The Elementary Perceiver and Memorizer (EPAM) is a computer model of human associative memory and the processes of verbal learning. Analysis of the failures of one earlier version of the model (EPAM II) to simulate certain features of human verbal learning behavior led the authors to formulate a more general model of verbal learning processes (EPAM III), which is discussed in this paper. In this model, EPAM information processes and structures have been generalized to deal with stimulus objects of arbitrary complexity. Discrimination processes discriminate objects on the basis of properties of the objects themselves or on the basis of properties of constituent subobjects. The learning processes of EPAM III provide an associative mechanism by means of which earlier learning can be brought to bear in a useful way on later learning. Exploration of the EPAM III model is concerned with simulating the behavior observed in psychological experiments on meaningfulness in verbal learning.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Paper series. The paper was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.