System considerations in regional information exchange.

Expert InsightsPublished 1962

A discussion of the reasons for the widespread interest in improved systems for the regional exchange of health, medical, and welfare information. First, substantial advances in both research and patient care might be achieved if the volumes of valuable data buried in files of health, medical, and welfare agencies were more accessible. Second, data electronic devices offer real promise of making better access to such data technologically feasible. Consideration is also given to the design of a regional information system characterized by many geographically remote input and output stations linked to a central processing and storage facility.

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1962
  • Pages: 15
  • Document Number: P-2662

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

System considerations in regional information exchange. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1962. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P2662.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.