The military role in space: a summary of official, public justifications

Expert InsightsPublished 1962

Comments on the interdependence of scientific, military, and commercial uses of space. While American policy has generally emphasized its use for peaceful purposes, military needs have had to be recognized. The basic justifications for the military interest in space have been that: (1) military activities in space should be regarded as extensions of regular military activities; (2) only those space activities fulfilling strict proof of military requirement should be encouraged; and (3) it is necessary to engage in basic research to create building blocks for space systems of future military value. 29 pp.

Document Details

  • Availability: Web Only
  • Year: 1962
  • Pages: 36
  • Document Number: P-2681

Citation

Chicago Manual of Style

The military role in space: a summary of official, public justifications. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1962. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P2681.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.