Counting Correlations in Boson Beams.

D. Holliday

ResearchPublished 1963

The photon-counting correlation phenomena first observed by Hanbury, Brown, and Twiss are analyzed using methods from the theories of stochastic processes and quantized fields. A quantized field excited by a c-number source exhibits counting correlations when the c-number part of the field is a sample function of a random process with statistically independent modes, an example of which is shown to be a black-body radiation field. The counting covariance for such fields is found to be the sum of two terms: a "quantum mechanical" term that is a consequence of the lack of commutability of the field operators and a term that can be derived from classical theory. A discussion of the counting correlation effect from the viewpoint of quantum statistical mechanics is given to demonstrate that the "bunching of boson" explanation of the effect is incorrect. Counting correlations in more general types of fields are considered. 59 pp.

Order a Print Copy

Format
Paperback
Page count
59 pages
List Price
$23.00
Buy link
Add to Cart

Document Details

  • Availability: Available
  • Year: 1963
  • Print Format: Paperback
  • Paperback Pages: 59
  • Paperback Price: $23.00
  • Document Number: P-2827

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Holliday, D., Counting Correlations in Boson Beams. RAND Corporation, P-2827, 1963. As of September 11, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P2827.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Holliday, D., Counting Correlations in Boson Beams. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1963. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P2827.html. Also available in print form.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.