Bigger and Better Mathematicians

Richard Ernest Bellman

ResearchPublished 1964

The author sees little hope of improvement. Mathematicians urgently need much larger and faster computers for solving a large category of practical problems. Work should have begun five years ago on digital computers 100 to 1000 times faster and 1000 to 1,000,000 times larger than current computers. Attention, however, seems to have been diverted by "gimmickry" and the glamour of "thinking machines." The author sees little hope of improvement.

Document Details

  • Availability: Out Of Print
  • Year: 1964
  • Paperback Pages: 6
  • Document Number: P-2863

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Bellman, Richard Ernest, Bigger and Better Mathematicians, RAND Corporation, P-2863, 1964. As of September 13, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P2863.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Bellman, Richard Ernest, Bigger and Better Mathematicians. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1964. https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P2863.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND paper series. The paper series was a product of RAND from 1948 to 2003 that captured speeches, memorials, and derivative research, usually prepared on authors' own time and meant to be the scholarly or scientific contribution of individual authors to their professional fields. Papers were less formal than reports and did not require rigorous peer review.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.